I know this journal is entitled The Things that Come to Mind at Two AM but today, you get one that comes to mind at five am. Courtesy of the dogs who woke me up at 4:30 am to be let out. So I was lying here in bed trying not to think of anything and my mind began to wander, as it often does.
Just before going to bed last night, I was reading a criticism about the Transformer's movie. I saw it yesterday in a jam-packed theater. I LOVED it but I'm a transformer fangirl from WAY back. Anyway, the criticism has to do with two of the minor characters who were expressly created for the film. Some people are saying that they are racial stereotypes. They "Jive talk" and fight all the time and don't read. One has a gold tooth. Apparently, this makes them caricatures and stereotypical black characters. I say apparently, because I didn't see it.
Anyway, my thought was this: Do you suppose some people, more sensitive to racial stereotypes, are predisposed to seeing them? You know, in a "If you go looking for it, you will find it," sort of way? I'm not racist in any way, shape or form. Despite growing up in Utah, which has a minority population of, last I checked, less than ten percent, I had friends from all color categories. I grew up in an Hispanic neighborhood. My friends included children from Polynesian families, white families, and yes, even African-American families. In Utah! Yeah, I know. My grandma's next door neighbors, who babysat me from time to time, were Japanese. (The father was interned during WWII.)
I just didn't see the racial stereotypes that some people are complaining about. The article I read can be found
here, at Yahoo news.
Now, and this will be
basically spoiler free, when I saw the twins, in car form, my first thought was, "OMGOMGOMG!! What car is that??!! It looks almost like a Chevy SmartCar?! That's SOO CUUUTTTEEEE!!!!! I silently commiserated with myself that Sasha would never fit in one and therefore, it didn't matter how cute it was, I would not be buying one. Once they transformed and started talking, I did not think "black." I thought "punk-ass." Punk-ass does not equal black in my mind. I also thought they kind of looked like
KISMET. I did not think they looked black, as some critics have said. Someone in the article also said there was a bucktoothed black actor in one scene, but I don't recall it. I thought all the African-American actors looked like, well, African American soldiers proud to do their duty.
Randomly, OMFG!! It's ACTUALLY RAINING!!!
Now it stopped. Thirty second rain storm! A new world record for this side of HELL!
*rereads* Oh so, anyway. That was my initial reaction and thoughts as I read the article last night and thought about it this morning. But then I had a further thought. These robots were created for comic relief and something for the kids to enjoy. Because Transformers is a family movie, apparently. I mean, sure, it's based on a line of toys from the 1980s and a related cartoon, probably specifically created to sell said line of toys. But there is an awful lot of swearing, sexual innuendo, and blowing up of things for it to be considered a family movie. I still would have taken my child to it. I'm not judging, just saying.
I am getting to my final point, honest.
So, here you have two robot cars who fight, swear, call each other names, are twin brothers, and don't read. And this is the comic relief that was added to the film? It appeals to children, no doubt. And as I said before, I thought they were cute and yes they were funny and I laughed. But my final thought was this, "why?" Why were these characters added to appeal to children? I watched the Transformers as a child. Bumblebee and Optimus Prime appealed just fine to me. Why do our children need to be appealed to with robots that fight, swear, and can't read? Why can't Bumblebee's loyalty or Optimus' inner strength, and his faith in humanity (and his "don't fuck with the things I care about" attitude) be the part of the movie that appeals to children?
Do we fear them incapable of that deeper connection? If we didn't pander to them, they would rise to the occasion, I promise.
Is it easier to appeal to a "lowest common denominator?" (Which feeds into the dumbing down of America and the rise of Mediocrity.) If someone's worried about laughs, Bumblebee is pretty damn funny. If they were added for slapstick value, that's fine too. I understand slapstick comedy. I'm also a three stooges fan. But if that were the case, then the explanation should have been that the director wanted some slapstick to break up the explosions.
And that was my thought, at five am.
I think kids of all ages respond better to characters that can't read like Broadway and Hudson (in Disney's Gargoyles), who don't because where they came from (Scotland, 1000 AD) didn't expect anyone but a select few to read (mainly the only ones who read in the Dark Ages were priests), then put them in the 1990's New York, where everyone is expected to read at some level - and then show those characters facing this situation, then learning to read. Much more identification there, I think, simply because when you're young, you are wanting the skills and perks and power of adults, and are trying to figure out how to get there - and encountering obstacles on the way.
I remember some analysis of the TMNT cartoons, and how surprised they were that young girls were attracted to them, because they didn't expect girls to be attracted to a show with a lot of fighting and physical stuff instead of fluff and pretty things and only one real girl character (who was far more developed in the original Eastman and Laird comics, btw - damn, April got dumbed down). They asked the girls and got back, (paraphrased) 'well, they're fighting to protect their family against all the people who want to hurt them and take them away from each other'. Didn't hurt that they were *green* so anyone could identify with them, same as (IMO) the Transformers. I never heard about the (reported) demographics on the Transformers, but I expect it was similar.
The studios are still writing (and accepting) scripts from the 50's, I think - they haven't really changed that paradyme (sp?) yet. Or they cancel (read - put into horrible time slot for self-defeat) when it does break the mold (there goes The Unusuals... *sigh* Sara Connor *sob* Chuck? please don't go *whimper*)...
While they might find them funny, I think (hope) most kids (that would be old enough to go sit in a theater and watch this) laugh at the antics of the flat characters, but are more interested in the more complex ones.
I'd have to say it's writing to fit the studio producer's ok, though. Especially for "Children's" movies/programs.
I'm trying not to be spoiler-y about the lack of reading skills in the twin robots, it was more shrugged off, as if it was OK that they didn't read and people would be crazy to assume they could. Now, I'm willing to accept that I am sensitive to that particular take of them simply because I'm teaching children to read this summer and was appalled to hear such a throw-away line. From that perspective, it's not funny that they can't read, it's sad.
I think you're right re: the paradigm that runs Hollywood and the sadness that surrounds anything that isn't "lowest common denominator" banal. I keep hoping that cable television and internet competition will improve upon that but so far it just means more of the same simple formulaic shows with flat characters. Good thing we do read and do have books. I hope they don't go the way of newspapers.
/my two cents
Randomly, there are no black ganster wannabes in Utah. If they were going to be ganster in my mind, I'd have to see them as either Polynesian or Latino/a. Also, in a related way, if I don't see them in a racial light, am I then really racist and just don't know it? Have I been duped by the subtlety? None of these questions are meant to attack your comment, McHomie, I'm self-questioning. Because, as I said, I'm pretty sure I don't really care what color people are or what their culture is and for me, a robot is a robot, even if it can't read and does fight and might have a gold tooth and some people say it is a 'black' caricature. When I read the article, I knew exactly what the critics were referring to. I've seen my share of blaxploitation 1970s films and minstrel shows. However, in the moment of actually watching the film, I just saw two punk-ass robots, with no race, who were sending the wrong message to kids about reading or lack thereof.
More ponderings. Maybe I shouldn't think at five am. :-)
Hmmm.... I wonder if I had NOT grown up in Utah if I would have seen them differently.
.... If we respected 'jive talking' as a positive personality trait, would it be a negative stereotype? If minstrel shows had not relied on racism for laughs, would we have had blaxploitation films? What part does white man's burden play in Mudflap and Skids' inability to read?
Inquiring minds want to know!!
I want a Bumblebee action figure!!